PokéBase - Pokémon Q&A
0 votes

If it is please give me a moveset. If not, please give me candidates to replace it (such as a Flying-type or Levitating Pokemon).

Thank you in advance.

edited by
This is really too much.
It's ru and dragonite and Salamance are a lot better than this because of just alright s.atk
Jesus christ just check the viability list

1 Answer

2 votes
Best answer

No, not quite
Noivern is tiered as RU and has some usage in UU. it has a solid 123 speed and a decent 97 Special Attack, but even then, it’s other stats are sub-par and it is outclassed. It’s abilities aren’t spectacular, either. A Pokémon that far outclasses it (and shares the same typing) is Dragonite. all of Dragonite’s stats surpass Noivern’s besides speed, which it makes up for by using Agility or Dragon Dance. It’s also got Multiscale, which is one of the best abilities in the game. A good moveset would be:
Dragonite @ Heavy-Duty Boots/Weakness Policy
Ability: Multiscale
EVs: 252 Atk / 4 SpD / 252 Spe
Adamant or Jolly Nature
- Dragon Dance/Agility
- Dragon Claw
- Dual Wingbeat
- Iron Head
Another good option would be Landorus-Therian. it’s a very versatile Pokémon, with a good movepool, awesome stats, a great ability, and good offensive and defensive typing. A good moveset could be:
Landorus-Therian @ Life Orb
Ability: Intimidate
EVs: 252 Atk / 4 SpD / 252 Spe
Jolly Nature
- Earthquake
- Stone Edge
- Swords Dance
- Knock Off

Hope this helps!

selected by
Ok I agree new users. But these things you get on 1 search of Google! Okay but certain people have been handed viability list and they still ask. Why? Can you answer? Answer me
I don't mean to blast msgs or something, I only want to convince my point on this topic.
If he is confused then why doesn't the guy ask directly what he's confused about instead of asking like twenty questions like this one?
Oh no.. I know where this heading. For the sake of harmony, close this topic. Humble request. For the sake of harmony please. Let's solve this with cool minds please
Shouldnt this be discussed somewhere else?