A reply to Sempiternus, because I don't know how else to contact you: " the fact remains the question and hotcake's answer were perfectly valid." On the contrary, the fact remains that the question is invalid. I understand now that the rules are outdated, and if they were to be updated the size limit for images/.gifs would probably increase. What would not change is the rules against duplicate and trivial questions. A quick search of "pokemon with lowest base stats" would reveal a question answered a year and a half ago with the same answer (minus the BST). That question should also be considered trivial, though, because it still only takes 2 clicks to find the order of all pokemon from lowest BST to the highest, maybe 3 to scroll down. "Additionally, do you actually believe that if the Mods believes it is fine, you have something to go against it?" The fact is that this question is both a trivial and duplicate question, so regardless of anyone's opinion, this question should not have been asked. "Minimodding is considered bad regardless of being in the rules or not" I guess I agree with that, but it's hard to see why me informing someone of their violation against the rules is "bad." "Also, Scraf is one of the more respected users on the site and to an extent is quite influential." Every person has their own personality and receives different thoughts and comments differently. To have an influence on somebody, your words and actions should appeal to their personality. Scraϝ's reputation can make him more or less influential, depending on the personality. What I meant by "I may not have an influence, but neither do you" is that Scraϝ's reputation won't give him greater influence to certain people, like me. On further consideration, I think that his reputation will give him greater influence to others, though.
Sempiternus, I think your message was extremely biased. You could not admit to being at fault for anything, and was convinced I was 100% wrong.