"if Ninja truly was being just, then it won't be held against him in any way"
You misunderstood this portion then. I meant that it's in his interest to get to the bottom of his either way. I meant that in the event that he isn't guilty, he should work to prove his innocent, and if he is, then he should prove and just apologize. You're not reading closely.
The expert post was unhid one day ago, and that's not without hiding all the other opinions that were in the comments and the fact that the whole thing was hidden to begin with.
"Exactly, but what you're saying is that they should provide more info on the subject, not seeing that the Ban Reports are similar to this. I just don't agree on how you aproached the discussion by saying we need more detail to be proven innocent. Even the saying goes, "Innocent til proven guilty""
Then you're saying the same thing as me. I don't want Ninja to keep getting pestered by this just because nobody is going to elaborate on what happened. I outright asked hex on both the mute AND the lock, and he told me that he felt neither one was just. So when two officials are disagreeing, I consider it prudent to have someone look at the situation instead of hiding all around and pointing fingers.
"I never said you did, i was referring to what Mega said there, jeez calm down."
"The same can be said to him, as he was vague in how he explained what happened to him anyways. So that could play as a "opposite" deal. And also assuming that Ninja was throwing a tantrum and throwing in an "as usual" isn't helping your cause at all. I'll be certain to say that all auths abuse their power in some way, so i'm sure he won't get a demote or anything just for one server screw up."
I'm not upset, for one, and two, specifiy who you're talking about. The majority of the post addressed what I said, so it's really out of place to have something directed at someone else then. If you read this portion, I can't understand how the post suddenly shifted in who it was directed at.